Rated 3.8 / 5 from 3 logs on Katalog
The Vegetarian—winner of the Booker Prize and written by the Nobel laureate Han Kang—is one of those novels that’s both brutally transparent and hard to pin down. What is it? A feminist text about radical refusal? A condemnation of South Korea’s mechanisms of control? A study of the lies people tell so they never have to confront the cruelty they inflict? Whatever it is, it’s not about vegetarianism. What’s astonishing is how upsetting this book is while remaining almost entirely calm. There’s a quiet sense of inevitability running underneath: you never doubt that Yeong-hye will endure. Her refusal—simple, unwavering—has a force no one around her can neutralize. Confronted with an unexpected and unacceptable boundary, the violence escalates in a bid to restore the comfort they once had, that’s now denied them. The men empathize with one another, father apologizing to the husband. How shameful. People keep asking, “When did this start?” and answering, “When she stopped eating meat.” But that’s not true, is it? It started years ago. It started with the father—violent, drunk, traumatized by the war—and it never really stopped. It was always violent; she just let them pretend otherwise. When did it start? Who knows. Thousands of years ago? People call it Kafkaesque; I don’t see it. Kafka is jittery, sharp, somehow bringing to mind the click-clack of industrial machinery. Kang’s approach is different: cooler, steadier, more radical. In this book, she goes further. She allows a refusal that extends beyond gender norms, culture, the social contract. Go as far as you need to, reject your species, your genus, your kingdom. Climb as far back up the taxonomy tree as you need to, to escape the violence. It’s a lot for such a quiet novel. But that’s probably the point.
One of those books you read in a day! It’s about a woman who, without an explanation, stops eating meat and starts acting weird, which reaaaally upsets her family (vegetarianism in 2000s South Korea, a bit like the Balkans still today). This incident is explained from three different perspectives, but never hers. It’s a great setup to tackle the topic of rebellion against tradition. Or is just being oneself enough to be accused of rebelling? Many interesting themes: suffering as a result of rejection of a role forced upon a person. Suffering as a result of accepting it. Punishment for being different. Being the complete opposite, conforming, proper. Normal. And somehow still not being good enough. And other themes to look at, from childhood trauma and eating disorders to marital sexual abuse and (a lack of) compassion for the vulnerable. It’s a good book, I can’t imagine anyone regretting reading it. Just for me, it felt a bit unfinished, like it was missing another chapter or two. Or more. The writing is clear and concise, but not particularly memorable, but maybe because of this Croatian translation and I believe this was her first novel. I’ll definitely check out her other books!